Michigan Dairy Review
home about events links archives contact

RSS RSS/ATOM feed

2008 Dairy Survey

virtual dairy cattle encyclopedia of reproduction

cornpicker
CornPicker for Silage Hybrids
spartan nutrient cycle card


Efficient Liquid Manure Transport and Land Application

Tim Harrigan
Dept. of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering.

In recent years dairy farms have grown in size and efficiency. When more livestock are housed in one location, the volume of stored manure and the manure hauling distance to reach the land base needed for application also increase. Manure agitation, pumping, transport and land application typically cost $100-$160/cow per yr for a Michigan dairy farm. Because hauling and land application greatly impact labor needs and must align with tillage and planting plans, many farm managers are custom-hiring manure hauling services. We recently completed a study of labor, machinery and manure hauling rates (gal/hr) for custom applicators using 13 hauling systems on 10 farms in Michigan, Ohio and Ontario.

Tank Spreaders and Travel Time
When tank spreaders were used for over-the-road transport and land application they typically needed about 14 minutes plus travel time for each load. When hauling to fields near manure storage, applicators applied three to four loads per hour, but the hauling rate declined by 20%, 40% and 50% with one-, two-, and three-mile hauls, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Hauling rate of 5,000- and 9,000-gal tank spreaders with surface broadcast or injection.
manure_trans

The most effective way to increase the hauling rate was to increase the size of the spreader tank and increase transport speed. Speed and tank volume became more important as the hauling distance increased. For instance, increasing tank capacity 20% (e.g. from 7,000 to 8,400 gal) increased hauling capacity 8% near the pit, 13% with a 3-mile haul, and 15% with a 5-mile haul. A 20% increase in travel speed had little effect when hauling to fields near storage but increased hauling capacity 8% with a 3-mile haul and 11% with a 5-mile haul. Increasing the loading rate at the pit or increasing the injector flow rate by 20% increased hauling capacity about 4% when hauling near the pit, and 2% with a 5-mile haul.

Manure handling equipment has evolved to transporting and applying manure quickly and efficiently. Large spreader tanks, in-field holding (frac) tanks, nurse trucks with boom extensions, and high-capacity pit and spreader pumps have reduced the time needed for loading, unloading, transport and land application. Custom applicators who we observed used tank spreaders ranging in size from 6,000 to 10,000 gal and tractors with speeds ranging from 25 to 40 mph. Semi-tractors with nurse tanks averaged 31 mph fully loaded, and 35 mph when empty.

Flow and Unloading Rates
High-capacity manure pumps and pump agitators were available, but seldom used at full capacity because high flow rates can cause foaming in the spreader tank and in some cases pipe stands become unstable at high flow rates. The greatest flow rates were used for pit agitation. A typical pumping rate for tank spreader loading at the pit was 1,900 gal/minute (gpm).

Depending upon how the slurry was applied, spreader unloading rates ranged from about 900 to 3,000 gpm. The lower rate was with a 6-pt injector when the flow rate was controlled by a hydraulically-driven pump to achieve an agronomic rate of 7,000 gal/acre. The high rate was a broadcast application with a 9,500-gal tank spreader. A typical spreading rate was 2,500 gpm for broadcast application and 225 gpm/injector shank for injection. Injection units had five or six shanks, but one custom applicator used a nine-shank injector to increase spreading capacity.

The time needed to maneuver and position tank spreaders near the pit and in the field ranged from 5 to 7.5 minutes when hauling over-the-road from the storage pit to the field. Maneuvering time was reduced to 3 to 6 minutes when the tank spreaders remained in the field and were serviced by nurse trucks. Nurse trucks and truck-drawn spreaders needed more time for maneuvering and positioning in the field and at the pit, ranging from 4 to 9 minutes/load, total.

Summary
Manure land application may be a time-consuming task that can conflict with the timeliness of spring planting or be delayed until fall field and weather conditions are suitable for application. The capacity of tank spreaders declines with increased haul distance from storage to field.

Custom applicators generally have access to large tank spreaders, high-speed tractors, in-field frac tanks, nurse tanks with boom extensions, high-capacity pit pump/agitators and other equipment, and technologies that can improve hauling efficiency and improve productivity. The use of custom hauling services may be a good business decision for many dairy producers.

For more information about the on-farm study of involving custom manure applicators please refer to: Tim Harrigan, Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, E-mail: harriga1@msu.edu or Phone: 517-353-0767.

A 9,000-gal nurse truck servicing a 4,500-gal tank spreader.

manurepix

Two 5,000-gal tank spreaders in tandem with a broadcast application.
manurepix2

Six-point subsurface manure injector mounted on a 9,000-gal tank spreader.
manurepix3

Reference
Harrigan, T.M.  2010.  Liquid Manure Hauling Capacity of Custom Applicators Using Tank Spreader Systems.  Applied Engineering in Agriculture 26(5): 729-741.

Curent MDR articles

Enhancing Fertility of Lactating Dairy Cows
The lactating dairy cow is not as fertile as it used to... but there is hope.

Breakfast on
the Farm Impressons

Do BOTF
events change impressions about modern dairy farming? Yes!

Kirkpatrick Project: Bovine Leukosis
Reported here is summary of a completed project.

Lesson in Milk Marketing
Ways to avoid some of the financial disasters of recent years.

Feed Margins & Risk Management
A hindsight on the volatility of feed prices.

Manure Transport & Land Application
A study of 13 hauling systems in MI, OH & Ontario.

Raw Milk Worth the Risk?
An update on the raw milk debate.

Thumb H20 Project: Part 2
Focusing on constituents leading to water quality issues.

CMT & Milk Quality
The continuing mastitis problems in dairy farms.

Over $80,000 Scholarship Opportunities
Michigan Dairy Memorial Scholarship Foundation retains the lead in CANR.

Success of Ag Tech Dairy Judging Teams
Results of the 2010 judging teams.