Michigan Dairy Review
home about events links archives contact

RSS RSS/ATOM feed

2008 Dairy Survey

virtual dairy cattle encyclopedia of reproduction

cornpicker
CornPicker for Silage Hybrids


spartan nutrient cycle card


Do Cows Adapt Quickly to Robotic Milking?

Janice Siegford & Jacquelyn Jacobs
Dept. of Animal Science

Introduction
Last summer, the milking herd at MSU’s Kellogg Biological Station Pasture Dairy Research and Education Center (PDREC) moved into a new free stall barn, equipped with two robotic milkers. As we reported in a previous issue of Michigan Dairy Review (October, 2009), we collected data on the cows’ responses to being milked by the new system. The information allowed us to evaluate how well the cows adjusted to being milked by the robots. In this article, we report on some of that information more fully.

In Case You Were Wondering
Why is it important to understand how (or if) cows adapt to being milked by robots? As many of you know, stress during milking can inhibit milk let-down, which can reduce milk yield and could lead to health problems such as mastitis. Animals can experience stress for a number of reasons, including being introduced to something new, even if this new thing is not particularly painful or frightening. And since being milked by a robot would be new and different, even for an experienced milking cow, it could cause her to experience stress and inhibit her milk let-down.

In theory, there are several reasons that robotic milkers should provide a lower stress milking environment compared with a conventional milking parlor. First, a cow can choose when and how often she wants to be milked, setting her own milking schedule. Second, a cow doesn’t have to spend time waiting in a crowded pen outside the parlor before each milking. This should translate into less time away from feed, water, and stalls to lie in, and also into less bullying by other cows. Robotic milkers also remove humans from the picture, which for more timid or fearful cows, could be a good thing. And, last but certainly not least, the cow receives some concentrate feed while she is being milked by a robot. All of these elements translate into an environment with less stress, more reward, and more control for the cow, which for all animals, including dairy cows and humans, are typically good things.

But as we mentioned previously, when a cow is first milked by a robot this is a new and possibly stressful experience. A cow may need some time to adjust to being milked in a different environment, with different equipment before she can learn to enjoy the theoretical advantages to robotic milking. If she adapts quickly, the change from one system to another will probably not have a big effect on her productivity and health. If she does not adapt, or adapts slowly, the consequences could range from a drop in production, to a cow that becomes sick more easily, or to a cow that may need to be culled from the herd.

What We Did
Our study consisted of observing 75 lactating Holstein cows at PDREC as they made the transition from a double-six herringbone parlor to a Lely Astronaut A3 Milking System. Prior to the transition, PRDEC cows were milked three times a day in the parlor and were managed in three groups (first lactation cows, multiparous cows, and special needs cows).

Following the move, the herd was divided into two groups, balanced for parity and stage of lactation; each group had access to a single robotic milking machine. To go about measuring how well the cows adapted to being milked by the new robotic system, our study measured the number of times cows vocalized, defecated, urinated, stepped and kicked while in the robots (Figures 1a & 1b).

relaxed_cow
Figure 1: This cow is not exhibiting stress-related behaviors during milking. All four feet are firmly planted, and she is not eliminating or vocalizing.
not_relaxedcow
Figure 1b: This cow is exhibiting stress-related behaviors while being milked. She has one hind leg lifted, possibly ready to step or kick. Photos: Jaquelyn Jacobs.

We began our observations starting with each cow’s first milking (day 0) by the new robots. We continued to collect data for 32 days. We also measured milk yield over the same time period. We predicted that the cows would adapt quickly to the robotic milkers, and that as they became more comfortable in their new milking environment, they would show fewer stress-related behaviors while being milked. 

What We Found
During their first robotic milking (day 0), the cows vocalized, eliminated, stepped and kicked frequently, suggesting that they did not initially like being in the robotic milking stall or being milked by the robot.  However, in less than 24 hours, stepping and kicking prior to teat attachment dropped and vocalizing and eliminating in the robot stalls nearly disappeared (Figures 2a & 2b). The rapid decline of these stress-related behaviors could be due to the cows becoming more comfortable with the milking stall and robotic milking equipment and process, including the movement of the robotic milking arm and teat cups. The cows also could have become more focused on eating grain in the robot’s feeder and less focused on the actions of the robotic arm.

graph2a
Figure 2a: Steps and kicks in the robots before teat attachment tended to decrease over time.
graph2b
Figure 2b: Steps and kicks in the robots after teat attachment tended to increase over time. Primiparous cows stepped and kicked more in both cases than multiparous cows (p<0.05). Different lower case letters indicate differences between those data points (p<0.05).

Curiously, steps and kicks after teat attachment to the milking cups (i.e., during the milking process) increased between day 0 and 32. There are a number of possibilities as to why this may have happened, although it is impossible to accurately identify a single answer without additional research. During the first month, the new barn’s manure scrapers were not working well, leading to a large amount of manure in the barn and consequently a large number of flies. We were unable to discriminate between steps and kicks related to fly avoidance versus steps and kicks linked to discomfort with the milking process. Another possible reason the cows kicked more with the robots is the difference in pulsation ratio between the old conventional parlor and the robotic system.

The parlor milking system used had a pulsation ratio of 60:40, while the Lely robot milks at a pulsation ratio of 65:35. The difference in milking and resting ratio could have led to some discomfort during milking as the teats adjusted to the change. However, we did not inspect teats at the time, so it is impossible to know if the discomfort was a result of declining teat end condition. Lastly, the discomfort during milking could be due to cows’ being uncomfortable with being milked on a per quarter basis. In the previous milking system, all four udder quarters were milked for the same duration of time. Although unlikely, it is possible that the cows took longer than 32 days to adapt to this change.

The number of incidents of elimination and vocalization were great during teh first 24 hours of use of the robot system (Figure 3a). However, subsequently these events were low to nil.

graph3a
Figure 3a: The number of times cows vocalized, urinated or defecated in the robot decreased significantly over time, starting with day 1 (p<0.05). Different lower case letters indicate differences between those data points (p<0.05).

Importantly, milk yield, which had dropped to an average of 35 lb/cow in their first 24 hours in the new barn, rebounded to nearly 70 lb/cow/day within 4 days Figure 3b). Reduced milk yield in that first day was most likely because the cows were not fully letting down, particularly during their first milking by the robots.

graph3b
Figure 3b: Average milk yield per cow was significantly lower on day 0, but by day 1 had returned to the herd average of 70 lb. An asterisk indicates difference between that data point and all others (p<0.05).

During the first milking, the robot uses lasers to scan the udder and teats to learn the cow’s conformation. This process can take several minutes, which caused the first robotic milking to be longer than all later milkings; a fact which may have contributed to the cow’s discomfort during her first milking by the robot.

Another indication that cows adapted quickly to the robotic milkers was the number of cows that milked themselves voluntarily versus the number that needed to be fetched by the stockperson to be milked. Within a week of introducing the cows to the robotic milkers, over 80% of the herd was milking voluntarily. After 2 weeks, over 90% of the herd was milking voluntarily and after 2 months over 97% of the herd was milking voluntarily. Only 2-3 cows needed to be fetched every 12 hours to be milked while the remainder of the herd went through the robotic milkers voluntarily over 2.5 times per day. 

Conclution
In summary, according to most of our measures, the cows seem to have adapted quickly to being milked by the robotic milkers. One puzzling piece was the increase in the number of steps and kicks following teat attachment. Unfortunately, this result seems to have left us with more questions than answers, and it may be worthwhile to further investigate the rate of adoption between these two systems.  Extending the data collection period beyond 32 days also may be necessary during future investigations, as it may take longer for cows to adjust to milking with a new machine than previously thought.

The PDREC farm staff worked closely with Lely representatives to design a transition protocol based on the manufacturer’s previous experience and our particular herd and facility. If you are considering a transition to robotic milkers, we recommend taking advantage of the manufacturer’s advice. You also should invest some time talking to other producers who have made the transition to learn about possible problems and solutions.

**************
Acknowledgements: The data presented in this article was collected as part of Jacquelyn Jacobs’ Master’s research. Thanks to Aislin Hardee, Krista Beeker, Courtney Daigle, Jolene Talaski, Mat Haan, Olivia Genther, and Chelsey Shivley for their help collecting data and hair dying cows for identification. Thanks to Rob Ashley and the PDREC farm crew for their assistance with this project.



Curent MDR articles

Farm Animal Welfare Evaluations
Modern animal husbandry methods are designed in the animals’ best interest.

Characteristics of Michigan DHI Herds
Michigan DHI herds based on two characteristics: production and herd size.

2010 Animal Science Research Forum
Dairy science topics at the 2010 Research Forum.

Reproductive Efficiency of High Producing Cows
Associationof milk production and fertility of dairy cows is more complex than it looks.

Do Cows Adapt Quickly to Robotic Milking?
Reasons why robotic milkers provide a lower stress milking environment than a conventional milking parlor.

William Robb Retires
Bill retires after 34 years.

2010 Income Tax Planning
Something to keep in mind before you file for 2010 income tax.

Gain Greatest Value from Manure Nutrients
As harvesting come s to an end, manure applications begin in earnest for most dairy producers.

Snapshots of Feed & Manure Management
On many dairy farms, it may be possible to put more feed nutrients into milk and more fertilizer and manure nutrients into crops and pasture.

Artisan Cheese Workshops
Workshops that teach how to make uniform, high quality cheese that meet today’s food safety regulations.

US Dairy Policy at a Crossroads
Learn about current policies, alternative proposals, and the dairy policy outlook.