nosmiles agrees: The first two tracks represent the entire album. There is a repetative consistency of funky beats, catchy melodies, and groovy spoken word. "The Treehouse" reflects Stuart David's yearn to play with electronic beats and cute music. "Impossible Things #2" allows David to show off his quirky lyrics and irresistable accent.

Also shown in the second track is David's talent for incorporating sounds into songs. The typewriter fits in perfectly, matching not only the music but the lyrics as well. There are various amounts of instruments and textures incorporated into each song. Unfortunately, this combination recurrs throughout the album.

An example of the repetiation can be heard on the fourth song, "Festival '95." Interestingly, though, one could say that this repetition is mere simplicity, and that simplicity is brilliant. Although practically the same melody is being repeated, it does make the song sound like any other. It's individuality is retained (which is more than I can say for their third album, Snare).

I must be honest and say that it took me many listenings before I actually listened to all the words on the spoken word tracks. It is easier to simply like the others better, but I encourage you not to do this. Although all the tracks are similar, they are all good in their own right.

Also, Belle & Sebastian fans must be warned that Stuart David went the experimental path. Up A Tree is musically and lyrically great, but it cannot compare to a B&S album.

Best Aspect: quirky lyrics; integrated sounds
Worst Aspect: Repetition of A+ formula
Yay: Burning Flies, Ballad
Nay: N/A
The hits: N/A
Similar: It's the B&S guy, not the B&S sound
Style: Groovy Spoken Word, Electronic Beats