This morning Im preaching the sixth in a series of
sermons on a Spiritual Covenant with America treating the Covenant for
Environmental Stewardship. There are three parts to this covenant, as I see it
Part one is our interdependence, part two is voluntary simplicity and ethical consumption,
and part three is the global economy.
The first, most important part, in my humble opinion, is
the fact of our interdependence. This congregation, by associating itself with the
Unitarian Universalist Association has covenanted to affirm and promote respect for the
interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part. It is not that you as members
have to believe in the interdependence of all existence but rather that we as a
congregation promise to behave as if we are interdependent and affirm and respect
that mutual relationship. This subtle difference between creed and covenant belief
and practice is important to our faith together.
In the reading this morning, Wapner refers to our
interdependence when he writes,
"the earth is not the backdrop for our lives, but is
part and parcel with them." Upon reading that statement, I was immediately reminded
me of Emerson, from his essay, the Over-Soul, "meantime within man is the soul
of the whole; the wise silence; the universal beauty, to which every part and particle is
equally related; the eternal One." He goes on to say, "We see the world piece by
piece, as the sun, the moon, the animal, the tree; but the whole, of which these are the
shining parts, is the soul."
The whole is the soul he means the Over-Soul, which
the essay is titled. The connecting spirit or Supreme Cosmic Spirit of Hindu philosophy
known as Brahman, or the Spirit of Life. Whatever that thread is in the web of
life that connects us all to all, and makes us, therefore, interdependent. "The earth
is not the backdrop for our lives, but is part and parcel with them."
Emerson helped crack open traditional definitions of God,
broadening our understandings and names for such. He helped us move from a notion of God
sovereign and separate from the Universe, the creator and external to the system, to God
the tie or the glue or the thread that makes a Universe greater than its parts. As my own
personal yoga practice deepens, I have begun to appreciate the significance of
Emersons father, William Emerson, having published the first Sanskrit scripture
translation in the United States. Our ancestors, the Transcendentalists, Ralph Waldo
Emerson and his friend, Henry David Thoreau were captivated by the Bhagavad-Gita and other
Indian spiritual texts, and you can see the influence of the teachings of the
Bhagavad-Gita on their American transcendentalism. I find much of the yogic teaching quite
compatible with the Unitarian Universalism I was raised with and I often think I
may have William Emerson to thank for that.
Our basic interdependence is what both Wapner and Emerson
are referring to when they say we are part and parcelor part and particle of the earth and
the Universe. And it is our interdependence that requires us to take environmental
stewardship seriously, because our fate is directly tied to that of the planet and all
life.
Lerner points out, "few people have found a way to
connect their caring about the earth to actual life choices that would make a serious
impact in saving the planet from destruction." I might put it another way. Its
not like its about caring about the earth, as if I am something other than the
earth. Its about caring for myself as a part of the earth and caring for the
earth as a part of myself . but I agree with Lerner that few people have found a way
to connect their understanding of our interdependence and caring for ourselves to actual
life choices that would make a serious impact in saving us from destruction.
"We see the world piece by piece, as the sun, the
moon, the animal, the tree" writes Emerson, and from that partial view, it is easy to
understand the scarcity mentality of the river in our story for all ages this morning, who
grieves the loss of the clouds without realizing that she and the clouds are the same
substance.
Once we realize that we are enough. We are enough, that we
have enough, and that there is enough only then, I believe, can we be proper
stewards of the earth and the universe as we experience it as a part of it. As Rabbi
Lerner says, "it is our scarcity mentality that drives our rapacious consumption of
the finite resources of the planet." This first part realizing that the
earths resources are enough to sustain us if we learn to respect and cherish them
is the most important part, and the hardest part, and the part that requires
spiritual discipline.
Part two
Voluntary simplicity and ethical consumption are certainly
made easier if we know that we have enough. The key to voluntary simplicity, in my mind,
is in the word voluntary. There are folks the world over who live simply, live on little,
live on not enough but that is involuntary poverty and voluntary simplicity
is different, though it might look objectively quite the same. When I served in the Peace
Corps, I was voluntarily living simply. One way it differed from the poverty around me was
that I knew I had a choice. I knew that it was temporary. Your former minister, Tomm
Smith, comes to mind. Tomm who, as I understood it from the folks who talked about him at
his memorial service, Tomm voluntarily left behind a middle class lifestyle to pursue a
life more like his understanding of Jesus life. We make choices every day the
choice to drive or walk somewhere, the choice to carry our own bags to the grocery store
or have our groceries bagged in plastic the choice to garden when we can, or clean
ourselves with lots or little water. Sometimes when our habits are well established, we
forget that we even have a choice, and to change our habits is really quite hard. Changing
our habits is really quite hard. This is one reason I think that the spiritual awakening
to our interdependence and enoughness must be a part of a simple living plan. We can
temporarily shame ourselves and others into scarcity thinking and simple living but
I dont think the good we do by living simply out of shame is the same as voluntary
simplicity from a place of wholeness and enoughness, if for the simple reason that we
dont attract others to the lifestyle if were doing it from a place of scarcity
and shame. I think of Wendell Berry here, whose words I opened with a champion of
both simple living and ethical consumption. "The abundance of this place, the songs
of its people and its birds, will be health and wisdom and indwelling light."
In the book, The Left Hand of God, Rabbi Lerner gets
quite literal with the term ethical consumption. I want to read to you a section
from the book that I didnt include in the reading this morning, but I think is
really important:
"Judaism has developed the notion of foods that are
acceptable for eating (kosher) and those that are not (treyf). Some foods were designated
kosher because of ethical concerns. For example, if you were a landowner, it was not
kosher to eat foods from the corners of your fields because the Torah mandates that those
corners must be left open for the poor. Not all the rules have clear ethical
purposes," he writes, "but abiding by such dietary guidelines makes eating an
intentional, spiritual act. With every bite, followers of the kosher laws are reminded
that food is not simply theirs for the taking, but has generously been given to them.
"Today, the Jewish renewal movement advocates
extending this practice of intentional eating so that foods whose production harms the
environment or is unjust to workers are treyf. The notion of ethical consumption already
has a powerful foothold in the "fair trade" movement regarding coffee, teas, and
chocolates. By encouraging people to buy only those products that can be certified as
having been produces in ways that are both ecologically sound and fair to the workers who
pick the corps and bring them to market, this movement has already made an important
contribution to improving the quality of life of workers in the countries in which the
food was grown."
A similar concept is behind the slow food movement so named
to contrast itself with and
"counteract fast food and fast life, the disappearance
of local food traditions, and peoples interest in the food they eat, where it comes
from, how it tastes and how our food choices affect the rest of the world." (www.slowfood.com)
Food is a powerful place to start since its so basic
to our survival. Rabbi Lerner and the network of spiritual activists advocates taking this
same concept and expanding it beyond food to cover all products.
Part three
Change the global economy so that it is ordered in rational
and sustainable ways. Ive been thinking about this a lot this week after
Tuesdays drop in the stock market. When I was an English as a Second Language
teacher in Washington state, I had a student from Russia who had experienced the economic
devastation of his country and my relationship with him made me keenly aware of the
tentativeness of our entire economic system, the vulneratibility of it. The Gross Domestic
Product is probably the most widely used indicator of economic growth and well being. It
measures the total value of all products and services bought and sold. It makes no
distinctions between productive and destructive activities and so rises even as the
quality of life declines, say because were spending money to repair damage from
Hurricane Katrina. The gross domestic product doesnt measure resources until they
are consumed. Trees are not measured as having value until they are cut down for timber,
and then they count. The GDP celebrates consumption rather than conservation and
encourages unsustainable depletion of finite resources. The GDP ignores all activities and
services that have no price attached to them. So when churches have to hire staff because
their members no longer have discretionary time to volunteer theres a
positive value placed on the loss of your discretionary time, or the quality of life.
This measure of our economy values growth at all costs over
the things that really matter to people, such as clean air and water, a healthy and safe
community, and the free time to enjoy them. Its time to change the way we measure
progress .
I return to the Social Responsibility Amendment that I
preached about in a previous sermon of this series This proposed Social
Responsibility Amendment would require corporations to get a new corporate charter once
every ten years and that charter would only be granted to those corporations that
could prove to a jury of ordinary citizens that it had a satisfactory history of social
responsibility. And yes, this is really out there in terms of being hard to imagine
getting from this point where natural disasters get measured by the gross domestic
product as positive to where Walmart would have to prove to a jury of ordinary
citizens that it had a satisfactory record of social responsibility in labor practices and
environmental sustainability in order to renew its charter.
But were not going to get from here to there without
advocating and pushing for some radical changes to the way we do business in this country
and around the world. Thats the third part of this Covenant of Environmental
Stewardship .
The second part of this covenant is that we can connect our
interdependence and caring for ourselves to actual life choices that would make a serious
impact in saving us from destruction. When we do that, our belief in the possibility of
environmental salvation can become self-fulfilling. We can make some different choices
and break some bad habits. We can choose simpler lifestyles and make ethical
choices in consumption, and in so doing, arouse in others their own awareness of the need
and desire to act as stewards for this incredible living earth of which we are a part.
Writes Wendell Berry, "The abundance of this place, the songs of its people and its
birds, will be health and wisdom and indwelling light."
And the first part, the most important part, is that we
have to do it, because it is a closed system we are it, we are enough, and we are
all there is. Our interdependence means that our every action matters. Global warming
couldnt make that clearer, could it? "The earths resources are enough to
sustain us if we learn to respect and cherish them." Since happiness cannot be
obtained through endless consumption, we can stop now. We can stop killing ourselves,
killing the planet, killing us. Writes Berry, "This is no paradisal dream. Its
hardship is its possibility."
* Sermons are meant to be spoken and not
written. I have not edited this homily to written form.
Sermons copyright 2007, all rights reserved.
Unitarian Universalist
Church of Greater Lansing
855 Grove St. | East Lansing, MI 48823 | 517-351-4081