The purpose here is to provide the details of trip spending frofiles for further research. The following tables describe the trip expenses according to 1) residences, 2) lodging types and 3) activities. Details of research population and methods are discused after the list of tables.
LIST OF TABLES
There are nine tables for these spending profiles, namely:
Table 1A: Trip Spending by Boating Segments (boater vs. non-boater, $ per party-day)
Table 1B: Trip Spending by Boating Segments (boater vs. non-boater, $ per party-trip)
Table 2A: Trip Spending by Fishing Segments (angler vs. non-angler, $ per party-day)
Table 2B: Trip Spending by Fishing Segments (angler vs. non-angler, $ per party-trip)
Table 3A: Trip Spending by Activity Segments (active vs. passive activity, $ per party-day)
Table 3B: Trip Spending by Activity Segments (active vs. passive activity, $ per party-trip)
Table 4A: Trip Spending by Fishing Segments (boat-fishing vs. other angler, $ per party-day)
Table 4B: Trip Spending by Fishing Segments (boat-fishing vs. other angler, $ per party-trip)
Appendix: Participation in Recreation Activity
STUDY POPULATION AND METHODS
The study population was parties visiting designated recreation sites along the Upper Mississippi
River System between November 15, 1989 and December 15, 1990.
The UMRS system covers the Mississippi River from St. Paul to
St. Louis, along with the Illinois River up to but not including
Cook and DuPage counties. A stratified random sample was taken
of visitors at sites along the river. 1,697 parties were contacted
on site, 1,316 responded to the on-site survey. Of these, 1,088
agreed to participate in mailback portion of the study and 683
parties returned useable questionnaires (63% response rate of
those mailed). Durable goods spending is based on 1,316 parties,
trip spending on 683 parties.
UNIT OF ANALYSIS = party visit, includes all spending by the party during their trip.
SPATIAL EXTENT: Trip spending was measured within 30 miles of the site where the party was interviewed and for the entire trip. "Local" spending on durables is defined to include durables purchased within a UMRS corridor region consisting of all counties bordering the river.
AREA DESCRIPTION. A wide range of types of facilities, areas and population subgroups are represented. Study sites range from urban to rural and include campgrounds, boat launch facilities, state, county and local parks, visitor centers, day use areas, picnic areas, and river overlooks.
DATE OF STUDY. 1990
REFERENCES.
Propst, D.B., Stynes, D.J., and Jiao, H. 1992. Development
of visitor spending profiles for the Upper Mississippi River System.
Report submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment
Station, Vicksburg, MS.
U.S. Army Engineers. (in press). Economic impacts of recreation on the UMRS: Recreation use and activities report. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District, Planning Division.
Last Updated: July 1996
Analyst/Contact: Wen-Huei Chang