PHL 200


Study Guide
Second Exam

 

You should be able to:

 

Explain what Cartesian Substance Dualism is. Discuss the properties that minds and bodies are supposed to have according to this view, and what it means to be incorrigible about the mind.

 

Explain some alleged problems with Cartesian Dualism, especially the problem of causal interactionism. Explain what physicalism (materialism) is and understand the various formulations of this view.

 

Explain what Ryle means by “the ghost in the machine,” and why Ryle thinks that the Cartesian picture is an example of a category mistake (know what Ryle means by “a category mistake”).

 

Understand the distinction between rationalism and empiricism, and be able to name at least one philosopher we’ve studied who supports each of these positions.

 

Understand what a criterion is. Say a little about Locke’s criterion of personal identity. Explain Locke’s distinction between the person and the man. Discuss the problem of apparent memory. Explain Hume’s position on personal identity. 

 

Explain the example of the ship of Theseus. Be prepared to defend some opinion of this case. Understand why this example is relevant to the debate over personal identity.

 

Explain the major types of criteria for personal identity. Know the implications of holding each of these views. You should be able to comment on the following views: immaterial self, brain criteria, animal criteria, bodily criteria, memory criteria, space-time worm.

 

Be prepared to discuss the fission, fusion and the teletransporter cases. Be prepared to say what effect the various views of personal identity have on beginning and end of life cases. Be prepared to discuss these cases in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions.

 

Explain Gretchen Weinrob’s criticisms of Sam’s dualism, especially the argument for groundlessness. Be prepared to explain and discuss the chocolate analogy and the argument from possible metamorphosis. Explain how making a distinction between metaphysical claims and epistemological claims is helpful to this discussion.

 

Discuss Peter Goodman and Mary Godwin’s view about personhood. Explain why Mary Godwin brings up issues about the status of women in the 18th century. 

 

Understand the distinction between being a person in the primary and literal sense and being a person in a secondary sense.

 

Explain Taylor’s parody of Paine and Wolstoncraft (Godwin). Understand Paine and Godwin’s reasons for expanding rights (and personhood) to all human beings. Explain what a slippery slope argument is and why Taylor’s argument is an example of such an argument.

 

Explain what the Turing Test is. Understand what assumptions are being made by the Turing Test. Comment on Dennett’s test for a great city, and explain how this analogy is relevant to the Turing Test.

 

Know and be able to comment on the argument from impaired humans, the cast of millions argument, and the Chinese box argument. Present Mary Godwin’s response to these arguments.