Reasonable
Guidelines for Evidence and Acceptability
When
Are Premises Acceptable?
1.
When they are supported by cogent sub-arguments
Freedom,
in education as in other things, must be a matter of degree. Some freedoms
cannot be tolerated. I met a lady once who maintained that no child should ever
be forbidden to do anything, because a child ought to develop its nature from
within. “How about if its nature leads it to swallow pins?” I asked, but I
regret to say the answer was mere vituperation. And yet every child, left to
itself, will sooner or later swallow pins, or drink poison out of medicine
bottles, or fall out of an upper winder, or otherwise bring itself to a bad
end. At a slightly later age, boys, when they have the opportunity, will go
unwashed, overeat, smoke till they are sick, catch chills from sitting in wet
feet, and so on—let alone the fact that they will amuse themselves by plaguing
elderly gentleman, who may not all have Elisha’s powers of repartee. Therefore,
one who advocates freedom in education cannot mean the children should each do
exactly as they please all day long. An element of discipline and authority
must exist.
P1) Both younger and older children, left to themselves, can easily come to physical harm.
P2) Older children, left to themselves, often are very annoying to
adults.
So,
L) Children simply cannot be left to do as they please all day long
Therefore,
C) There must be some element of discipline and authority in
education.
When the premises are supported elsewhere
E.g., when a footnote cites a study or an authority that
supports the premise.
When they are known to be a priori true (contrast
with empirical)
All bachelors are unmarried men.
When they are a matter of common knowledge
-
Human
beings have hearts
-
Dogs
poop
When
are Testimonial Premises Unacceptable?
1. When they are implausible
(contradict common knowledge)
2. When they come from an
unreliable person or source
* My Side Bias (e.g., a sports fan isn’t an
objective observer)
3. When the claim goes beyond what the person could know from personal
experience.
·
Is
the authority a recognized expert in her field?
·
Is
the authority commenting on something in her area of expertise?
·
Does
what the authority says make sense?
·
Do
the authorities disagree?