![]()
A variety of interpretational differences between sentences has been handled in linguistic theory by appealing to a unified opposition of homogeneity/quantization across traditional category boundaries. In nominals, the count/mass distinction has been attributed to homogeneous representations: mass nouns are homogeneous whereas count nouns are quantized. Homogeneity also plays a role in events for the interpretation of telicity. Durative (atelic) events are homogeneous whereas terminative (telic) events are quantized. It is also well known that these two categories interact in aspectual composition leading to telicity alternations of an event due to the count or mass interpretation of its nominal. Thus interpretational differences find a unified explanation that both describes the interpretations given within these categories and explains their compositional interaction. Given this unified account, a basic question to be explored is the kind of processing
differences we should expect to arise from homogeneous representations as compared to
their quantized counterparts. Of particular interest is a linking between representational
complexity and the directionality of processing costs. Given that quantized
representations require extra steps adding a count or providing termination to the
representation, we may suspect that quantized representations are more complex than In several studies, the processing of homogeneous representations is explored in both
nominals and events. This work links a particular processing theory to the linguistic
representations thought to underlie the interpretational process, finding that processing |
Return to Colloquia Page || LSO Home || MSU Home
....